Thinking Points

  • Nintendo (TSE: 7974) plans to launch its Switch Online service in September 2018.
  • Many gamers and few investors seemed to notice the announcement.
  • Investors ought to pay more attention, especially given Nintendo’s unique position in the video game industry.

Overview

In its Q3 2017 earnings call, Nintendo announced its September 2018 launch of the Nintendo Switch Online service. Though video game related websites quickly picked up on the news, the investment community apparently missed it – probably because the earnings call offered more tangible information for investors to chew on, like the Nintendo Switch becoming the fastest selling video game console in US history.

Interestingly, prior to its launch in March 2017, folks were worried the new console would be another dud like the Wii U. Even industry executives commented that Nintendo had no place in the console business.

Ten short months after launch, the Nintendo Switch had sold 14.86 million units worldwide, already surpassing Wii U’s 13.56 million units in cumulative sales and displacing its own Wii console as the fastest selling game console in US history. Now, Nintendo wants to enhance the fastest-selling console’s online offering.

The Switch Online service  is not an earth-shattering move for Nintendo, especially given its competitors (Microsoft’s [MSFT] Xbox and Sony’s [TSE: 6758] Playstation) already monetize online services. If anything, the launch is overdue. That said, I am a little surprised the investor community has not picked up on the announcement, especially given Nintendo’s large following. The last Nintendo article written on Seeking Alpha when I checked today (March 3, 2018) is from January 25, 2018. Personally, I think the announcement said a little more than “Hey, we are going to have paid online services too!” and investors probably ought to take a closer look.

Switch Online

The price is set at $19.99 per year. In comparison, Microsoft’s XBox Live Gold and Sony’s Playstation Plus are both available in the $50 to $60 per year range.

Besides mentioning basic features – like online gameplay, classic games library, and social sharing  – Nintendo did not give out too many details:

Source: Nintendo

Presumably, Nintendo will be chasing Xbox Live Gold and Playstation Plus in building out basic features. Because Nintendo is Nintendo, I would not be surprised if they came up with one or two off-the-wall features as well.

To be sure, online services are not completely new to Nintendo. Just as the image above reads, Nintendo already offers some online services. It is merely becoming a paid service with more offerings in September.

Switch Online will not be a significant source of revenues

Considering Nintendo stock was very hot over the past year, I would not be surprised if investor interest is cooling down, particularly in the value camp.

Source: Google

It is not easy to make a growth case for a company at Nintendo’s scale to justify a 30x EV/EBIT multiple. To be clear, that is not what I am trying to do here. I am merely intrigued that Nintendo finally appears ready to modernize its old, one-off sale business model, yet nobody seems to be talking about it.

Frankly, a little bit of math would show that Switch Online would not add a ton of revenue, even if half of Switch players signed up. As a reference, Sony sold a cumulative 57.1 million Playstation 4 hardware units and had 26.4 million Playstation Plus subscribers at year-end 2016.

Source: Sony Investor Day 2017

As a side note, a single Playstation 4 can have multiple accounts, which means one hardware unit can have multiple separate Playstation Plus subscriptions. Saying that 46.2% of Playstation 4 owners have a PS Plus account would technically be wrong, but I think it is a useful metric.

Back to the Nintendo Switch. First, we will make a projection on how many total Switch units will be sold by the end of fiscal 2018 (March 2019).

In an interview with Kyoto Newspaper, Nintendo CEO Tatsumi Kimishima said he is hoping to achieve over 20 million in unit sales for fiscal 2018.

In fiscal 2016, Nintendo recorded 2.73 million units sold. For fiscal 2017, the company is forecasting 15 million units in sales, 12.13 million of which have already been sold as of December 31, 2017. Based on this, we are looking at a cumulative 37.73 million units sold at the end of March 2019.

With subscriptions costing $20 per year, total unit sales at 37.73 million units, and half of the units having Switch Online, we can get an idea of how much revenue to expect:

$20 per year * 37.73 million units * 0.5 = $377.3 million USD

On a trailing-twelve-month basis, Nintendo generated 1,035 billion yen ($9.8 B USD) in revenues. At the tail end of its console slump (i.e., fiscal 2017), Nintendo generated 489 billion yen ($4.65 B USD) in revenues. $377.3 million USD is 3.8% and 8.1% of revenues, respectively. Not insignificant, but hardly earth-shattering. With that said, I would imagine subscription revenues would generate higher margins than hardware revenues.

I think this is a rather optimistic, but not entirely unrealistic scenario given Switch’s popularity and lower subscription price.

Why is Switch Online significant?

If we look at the current generation video game consoles and compare them to the consoles we had 15 years ago, it is easy to see how far consoles have come. At one point, video game consoles only existed to sell video games. Today, video game consoles have become a part of a more comprehensive home entertainment system.

With the Xbox One and Playstation 4, you can play Triple A titles like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and Grand Theft Auto, published by major third-parties like Activision (ATVI), Electronic Arts (EA), and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Additionally, you can connect the unit to stream movies on Netflix, watch funny cat videos on YouTube, listen to your favorite online radio station, and the list goes on.

And then you have Nintendo.

Nintendo was late to this party. Actually, Nintendo has been late to just about every party over the past 5 years. But really, Nintendo was having its own party.

Some people point to Wii U’s weak install base for Nintendo’s lack of third-party video games, but the company has gone on its own path for quite some time. This can be attributed to Nintendo’s craftsmanship, which goes beyond producing video game hardware and software. Rather, the company produces both in order to create the whole gaming experience.

Take a look at the evolution of Nintendo’s game controllers and compare it with Microsoft and Sony. If there is one thing that pops out, it is Nintendo’s noticeably different controller layout for every console. In many ways, Nintendo’s progress has revolutionized video game development. Here is a perfect example on how the Nintendo 64 (mid 1990s) revolutionized 3D game design.

Source: Reddit (Gaming subreddit)

The top row shows the evolution of Sony’s Playstation controllers. The second row is that of Microsoft’s XBox controllers. Then finally, Nintendo’s.

Now take a guess: How many game developers do you think would want to learn a completely different, new way to design games every 5 to 10 years?

Sorry to disappoint, but I don’t have an exact answer. My best guess is that there aren’t many.

When you play the same triple A title on the XBox One and Playstation 4, the gamer’s experience is more or less the same. Both systems’ controller layouts are similar and the basic layout for both have remained the same since inception.

In case you are wondering why I am explaining all of this, it is because Nintendo’s real product is the whole gaming experience. The Nintendo Switch, with its record-breaking unit sales, is already hard to ignore for third-party developers.

Third-party developers can port their games to the Switch without much change.  Either that, or they can add functionality to leverage the Switch’s unique controller layout to design a new gaming experience using the same basic theme of their original game. While Nintendo is busy playing a different game, the XBox One versus Playstation 4 console battle tends to revolve around which console has better network connectivity, graphics, and price.

This puts Nintendo in an interesting position. Nintendo is not really in direct competition with Sony or Microsoft in the same way the two companies are going against each other. Soon, Nintendo will have its first serious internet-connected console at a scale that it has never seen before.

The bottom line

I was surprised the investor community did not seem to pick up on Nintendo’s announcement because of how the video game console landscape is structured. Sure, Playstation and XBox both have exclusive games, but both consoles rely heavily on third-party developers for content. Meanwhile, the gaming experience has more or less remained similar since inception and both consoles are going head-to-head in competition. In contrast, Nintendo has relied on bringing a whole new gaming experience with each console through internal hardware and software development.

The console war is mainly between XBox and Playstation, then you have Nintendo doing its own thing with the Switch. Hence, it makes perfect sense for a gamer to have a PS Plus or a XBox Live Gold subscription while having a Switch Online subscription, simply because the Switch is different. Why aren’t more investors intrigued by this?

 

Author: Kenkyo Investing

Kenkyo Investing applies a value investing approach to Japanese equities, providing insights that are often unavailable to non-Japanese speakers.

    3 replies to "Did You Miss Nintendo’s Switch Online Announcement Too? (TSE: 7974 Nintendo)"

    • Jared

      Hi Clayton,

      Greetings from Singapore,always a pleasure to read your blogs…i like your versatility between industry and stock specific write ups. As an investor in a fairly valued local market,im looking to enhance returns by staking in other parts of asia and japan comes up as a relatively still affordable market. However language is a barrier and your blog is a true gem in understanding the market better. However most jap companies also have very little IR comms( some nothing more than a president’s message and biz overview)..and while these companies may have solid financials and trade at reasonable prices,its always difficult to take that plunge without knowing more about the biz operations. Was wondering if you had encountered such situations where u are attracted by the profitability but know little to nothing about the underlying. Im thinking it may be safe to do so in japan but i dont really have a pulse on the corporate ethical levels of companies in japan either..so thought to consult your views on such propositions…would you consider investing in such companies?

      Many thanks,
      Jared

      • Clayton Young

        Hi Jared,

        Thanks for your kind comment! I’ll send you my response in an email 🙂

        Cheers,
        Clay

    • fabiano

      Thanks! Every bit counts.

Comments are closed.